So, because science doesn’t have an answer for your question, then intelligent design must be true? You’re conclusion is worthless and have zero to add to the discussion. Argument from ignorance. Thanks for playing.
Hmmm...
So, because scientists invent answers for your questions about the distant past, without any hard evidence other than their prejudiced interpretations of data existing only in the present, then intelligent design must be false? Your conclusion is worthless and has zero to add to the discussion. Argument from Ignorance. Thanks for playing.
See? Works both ways.