Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
Journalism borrows from the scientific method — unlike that dude in his boxers blogging away at what he's sure must be right. It's the same discipline used by the scholars, only with a stopwatch and with more pieces missing from the picture in the rush of the moment.

Thanks in large part to the internet, "that dude in his boxers" now has access to the same raw information that used to be sole preserve of "journalists." He can see that they are filtering that information to fit their preconceived notions, i.e. that they are NOT using the scientific method. And the fact that he's calling them on it makes them very defensive.

7 posted on 01/01/2011 6:01:24 PM PST by Huntress (Who the hell are you to tell me what's in my best interests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Huntress

There’s accountability as never before; the old-line media sources are vanishing; those which do not move to electronic distribution, and soon, won’t be around (the only exceptions being small-circulation small-town newspapers, which are mostly weeklies), maybe five years at the outside. The local garbage wrapper here spent massive cash on a supposedly state of the art printing facility in Walker; the paper is in multiple sections of course, but it’s left to the paper carriers to actually assemble it, and the one my mother has doesn’t do it, and often doesn’t include all the sections.


18 posted on 01/01/2011 8:11:31 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson