To: The Comedian
Wait just a tick. If these things are tossing anti-matter into the sky all willy nilly and all, how come no jet planes have been hit by all this anti-matter flying around up there?
I mean just by sheer accident one plane, somewhere, should disappear in a spectacular explosion every once in a while. Right?
19 posted on
01/11/2011 8:53:30 AM PST by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: Lurker
It’s all about the quantity of anti-matter.
I wouldn’t be all that surprised to find that many airplanes are missing dozens of atoms lost in matter/anti-matter collisions.
23 posted on
01/11/2011 8:58:03 AM PST by
null and void
(We are now in day 721 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: Lurker
Wait just a tick. If these things are tossing anti-matter into the sky all willy nilly and all, how come no jet planes have been hit by all this anti-matter flying around up there? Large bird kill reported near Geyserville http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2654975/posts
More than 1,000 turtle doves fall from the sky in Italy in latest mass bird death case http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2653126/posts
Mass La. bird deaths puzzle investigators http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2651330/posts
26 posted on
01/11/2011 9:00:35 AM PST by
frithguild
(The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
To: Lurker
how come no jet planes have been hit by all this anti-matter flying around up there? Single positrons. Just enough to generate the sort of Gamma rays detected during lightening storms, not enough to react on a macro level.
Tempests in the tiniest of teacups.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
27 posted on
01/11/2011 9:02:24 AM PST by
The Comedian
(Puzzling puzzle pieces precisely proliferating panoramically.)
To: Lurker
If these things are tossing anti-matter into the sky all willy nilly and all, how come no jet planes have been hit by all this anti-matter flying around up there? Maybe on account of all this funky crap is going on more than 100,000 ft MSL ... that's why it's being detected by satellites, rather than aircraft.
32 posted on
01/11/2011 9:09:11 AM PST by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Lurker
I thought the article spoke about the monitoring spacecraft getting
hit by beams of antimatter..no?
Probably not enough to cause structural failure, but suppose
it hit the right spacecraft.....
36 posted on
01/11/2011 9:19:06 AM PST by
Getready
(Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
To: Lurker
Wait just a tick. If these things are tossing anti-matter into the sky all willy nilly and all, how come no jet planes have been hit by all this anti-matter flying around up there?
You don't fly over serious T-storm. The monsters that do this can easily reach well over 35 thousand feet and destroy a commercial aircraft blundering into them. Commercial aircraft are incapable of getting above the biggest storms and antimatter would be the least of the worries if they go through them.
52 posted on
01/11/2011 11:02:32 AM PST by
TalonDJ
To: Lurker; All
And now you have the explanation for the Bermuda Triangle. ;-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson