Skip to comments.
Test shows dinosaurs survived mass extinction by 700,000 years
University of Alberta ^
| January 27, 2011
| Unknown
Posted on 01/27/2011 11:05:42 AM PST by decimon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
1
posted on
01/27/2011 11:05:46 AM PST
by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
01/27/2011 11:06:29 AM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
"Give or take a few years" recalls Helen Thomas.
3
posted on
01/27/2011 11:07:33 AM PST
by
MissTed
( Do women in burqas have fun tagging each other in Facebook photos?)
To: decimon
700,000 years is 70% of one million.
When talking about 64-67 million years ago, less than a single million is an “error” of less than 1.5%.
Not sure how confident I would have to be about the tolerance range of such numbers before going to publication, but that is just me.
Did make the news though..... rather weak sauce if you ask me.
4
posted on
01/27/2011 11:10:03 AM PST
by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: decimon
Obviously they will need to revise their theories. It wasn’t not uniform around the world obviously
5
posted on
01/27/2011 11:10:44 AM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php)
To: allmendream
6
posted on
01/27/2011 11:15:09 AM PST
by
catman67
To: decimon
“this particular plant eater was alive about 700,000 years after the mass extinction event many paleontologists believe wiped all non-avian dinosaurs off the face of earth, forever.”
But he was reeeeeaaal lonesome...
Colonel, USAFR
7
posted on
01/27/2011 11:16:45 AM PST
by
jagusafr
("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
To: decimon
Bob Bakker is right. The “mass” extinction was really a major extinction event amid a long slow decline.
8
posted on
01/27/2011 11:19:23 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: decimon
There goes THAT theory...
To: decimon
These dinos lasted 700,000 years past the supposed K-T event
All other dinos died 300,000 years before the supposed event
Birds, Sea Turtles, Alligators + Crocodiles, All Freshwater species, Honeybees and Photo-plankton lived through the supposed K-T event as if nothing happened (Even though they would be the organisms that should have been the 1st to go).
It's looking more & more that the K-T event was a non-event
Yes I know, An asteroid falling out of the sky and killing the big bad dinos sounds really, really cool, but sorry the evidence shows it just didn't happen.
10
posted on
01/27/2011 11:23:33 AM PST
by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: decimon
Alternatively the fellows who kept track of the dinosaur parks on Earth came around to do a survey and found all their animals had been killed ~ so, being good stewards, they brought in some newbies!
They came back 32.785 million years later on their regularly scheduled rounds only to find that LOCAL FAUNA had taken over and eaten all their hadrasaurs. They got so upset they nuked half the new animals.
11
posted on
01/27/2011 11:25:25 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: decimon
Test shows dinosaurs survived mass extinction by 700,000 years
12
posted on
01/27/2011 11:27:37 AM PST
by
pogo101
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
13
posted on
01/27/2011 11:35:46 AM PST
by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
14
posted on
01/27/2011 11:35:58 AM PST
by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
15
posted on
01/27/2011 11:35:58 AM PST
by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
16
posted on
01/27/2011 11:35:58 AM PST
by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
17
posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:03 AM PST
by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
18
posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:06 AM PST
by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
19
posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:06 AM PST
by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
20
posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:06 AM PST
by
Parmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson