[allmendream]

700,000 years is 70% of one million.

When talking about 64-67 million years ago, less than a single million is an “error” of less than 1.5%.

Not sure how confident I would have to be about the tolerance range of such numbers before going to publication, but that is just me.

Did make the news though..... rather weak sauce if you ask me.

[catman67]

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.

[Parmy]

I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.

So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.