To: Renfield; Quix; gleeaikin; 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; ...
I was worried because we hadn't had the final, definitive refutation of this theory in over a month. [snicker] Thanks Renfield and Quix!
16 posted on
05/23/2011 7:50:37 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
To: SunkenCiv
20 posted on
05/23/2011 8:03:06 PM PDT by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: SunkenCiv; Renfield
I was worried because we hadn't had the final, definitive refutation of this theory in over a month. {{{SNORT}}} From Firestone et al's book, best I recall is they were trying, amongst other things probably, to explain the disappearance of a species or two around the time period they were studying. I thought the book was fairly compelling, although it got a tad technical in places. In any case, after a quick read of this article I didn't notice any theories this group of skeptics offered by way of explanation. And their best refutation appeared to consist primarily of sour grapes...
31 posted on
05/24/2011 9:19:14 PM PDT by
ForGod'sSake
(You have only two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson