Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
"The dating of a feature from charcoal is problematic since the wood that was being burned may have been felled a long time before it was used.

Huh?

9 posted on 07/23/2011 8:18:54 AM PDT by null and void (Day 913. When your only tools are a Hammer & Sickle, everything looks like a Capitalist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

Weird statement, because I am sure the wood was cut well within the error of carbon dating.


10 posted on 07/23/2011 8:57:17 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

That’s confusing wording, imho. If the charcoal is from the core of the log, it’s going to be years, decades, or even centuries older than the newest ring and the bark. Cut down the tree, cut it up into firewood, and the same hearth can seem to show that some group kept building fires in the same spot for years, decades, or centuries.


18 posted on 07/23/2011 10:14:32 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson