***************************************EXCERPT******************************************
Mr Lynn says:
Just read the article and the comments so far. The Warmists are piling on, e.g.:
glennpecker 8 hours ago
Are you trying to discredit a person or an entire field of science? If you want to expose an individual for trying to suppress facts, I’m all for it. But the data supporting man induced climate change is [sic] overwhelming and to try to attack an entire field of science over a few emails and individuals is absurd. . .
I wonder where those “overwhelming” data are. . .
/Mr Lynn
***************************EXCERPT**************************************
Roger Knights says:
Third: The media is tarring and feathering Rick Perry, we now see, for agreeing with Nobel laureate Giaever and a host of other prominent scientists.
Huntsman challenged Perry at the recent Republican debate by saying that 97% of climatologists were in agreement. Here’s what Perry should come back with:
“I wouldn’t be surprised if 97% of them were Democrats.”
*******************************EXCERPT************************************
JPeden says:
Can We Really Call Climate Science A Science?
Hey, at least they repeat and repeat, and repeat, the same old “tried and true” cynical Political Science Propaganda tactics! And if they “win”, we all know what that would mean in the real world. That’s right, you’d have to listen to the likes of Hansen and Gore 24/7!