Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I'm beginning to think we will never see a decent photo of this thing.
1 posted on 11/10/2011 11:05:19 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin
I'm beginning to think we will never see a decent photo of this thing.

If this rock came close to Herman Cain, we would have thousands of pictures and some women saying it threatened them!

2 posted on 11/10/2011 11:07:44 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

If Kim Kardashian sunbathed on this asteroid, we would have great pictures!


3 posted on 11/10/2011 11:08:56 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

This could explain Perry’s poor performance during the debate last night, the added gravitational pull shifted Perry’s brain to one side of his skull squashing it a bit.


4 posted on 11/10/2011 11:09:06 AM PST by montyspython (This thread needs more cowbell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

If Kris Humphries had this asteroid mounted on a ring for Kim Kardashian, we would have good pictures of it!


5 posted on 11/10/2011 11:10:50 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

It was only about a quarter of an arcsecond wide at close approach. That’s incredibly tiny. Considering that, the radar pictures we have of it are actually quite good. In fact, at that size you’re doing really good if you can even just resolve it as more than a point-like light source (in other words, star-like). My telescope’s theoretical limit of resolution is only half an arcsecond, but I did get a nice timelapse of the asteroid moving against the stars during the close approach.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7Id2KvFUqo


6 posted on 11/10/2011 11:17:58 AM PST by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

You probably won’t see a good image of it because most everything we have pointed into space for imaging, can’t focus at such a close distance.


7 posted on 11/10/2011 11:20:40 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (Public employee unions are the barbarian hordes of our time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

This asteroid was discovered six years ago. Considering how close it gets to Earth I’m surprised NASA didn’t put a satellite together, launch it into orbit, land on the asteroid, and bring back a sample as well as high resolution photos.


9 posted on 11/10/2011 12:29:39 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

If it came “within smashing distance”, how come it didn’t smash?

It obviously did NOT come within smashing distance.


17 posted on 11/13/2011 12:17:52 PM PST by hattend (If I wanted you dead, you'd be dead. - Cameron Connor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson