Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pontiac
This just shows how thin evidence can be to make a scientific pronouncement today. He "Googled" it,.....WOW! Let's rewrite the textbooks once more only to change the theory 5 years later.

I'm not a scientist either, but any thinking person would also think C-14 would be everywhere, not just in Japan's cedar trees.

Besides, I thought C-14 had a constant decay rate and now they are saying it can be added after every stellar event? That would seem to change numbers everywhere and skew all kinds of numbers.

We KNOW the dates of some events because it is in recorded history. If we have stellar events between then and now, it looks like we could Measure C-14 from that period to check to see if there was a date skew in the measurements.

I think someone is looking for grant money instead of a job.

15 posted on 07/01/2012 9:54:30 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: chuckles
I'm not a scientist either, but any thinking person would also think C-14 would be everywhere
...and, that's exhibit A into why you're not a scientist, or have any interest in becoming one.


16 posted on 07/01/2012 9:58:08 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson