Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Renfield

Healthy...Right!!....Life expectancy was 33.


13 posted on 01/20/2013 7:23:23 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

They were healthy, but hygeine was non-existent and hunting accidents could be fatal.

The infant mortality rate must have been atrocious due to infections. Combine that with death at childbirth (newborn’s craniums were getting larger making birth more difficult) and hunting accidents, no wonder people did not live long statistically.


16 posted on 01/20/2013 7:45:56 PM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Healthy...Right!!....Life expectancy was 33.

Actually that was the AVERAGE life expectancy. Infant
mortality was really a bitch!

Once he makes it into late teens he has a pretty good chance of making it to 60 or 70 plus. Not at all different from our today’s expectancy except for the meds and stuff to make into the 80’s and 90’s.

Indians, for example, abandon their aged members when they cannot keep up with their nomadic movement. It is cruel but necessary.


17 posted on 01/20/2013 7:48:34 PM PST by Sen Jack S. Fogbound (We have met the enemy and they is us! After all, who voted Obama in?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson