1 posted on
10/23/2013 1:22:55 PM PDT by
Renfield
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
10/23/2013 1:23:08 PM PDT by
Renfield
(Turning apples into venison since 1999!)
To: Renfield
They are now all in DC..........
4 posted on
10/23/2013 1:24:49 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(The only way to defeat liberalism is to give them everything they want......then pick up the pieces.)
To: Renfield
In the beginning, God created ...
5 posted on
10/23/2013 1:25:51 PM PDT by
knarf
(`)
To: Renfield
I didn’t know Ringo Starr was a Neanderthal!
6 posted on
10/23/2013 1:26:31 PM PDT by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...)
To: Renfield
Or...modern humans walked out of the Garden of Eden (even if it wasn’t a literal garden and there weren’t literally two people in it) and the Neanderthals evolved from apes.
7 posted on
10/23/2013 1:26:58 PM PDT by
Bryanw92
(Sic semper tyrannis)
To: Renfield
These anti-evolution sites are getting real clever. Don’t put anything in the site name about the ax they are grinding and trick folks into going.
8 posted on
10/23/2013 1:34:21 PM PDT by
DManA
To: Renfield
He obviously has not seen the GEICO commercials. :-)
15 posted on
10/23/2013 3:44:58 PM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Renfield; donmeaker
By the way, on second reading, I noticed (!) that I had misunderstood what exactly was being studied.
I had
assumed, since it's the latest cutting-edge of technology, that these folks were studying DNA extracted from ancient teeth.
No. They were looking at the teeth themselves, morphologically, not at DNA from those teeth.
They found that teeth from homo antecessor did not closely enough match our own to be considered -- in their opinions -- as common ancestors with Neanderthals.
I'd say that's fine, since the truth of the matter seems to be highly complicated, and may-or-may-not directly include homo antecessors.
So this study simply tells us that science is still a long way off from finding definitive answers.
21 posted on
10/25/2013 1:59:38 AM PDT by
BroJoeK
(a little historical perspective....)
To: Renfield
43 Posts and not Helen Thomas pic posted.
Whew!
44 posted on
10/29/2013 4:56:18 PM PDT by
Rebelbase
(Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post))
To: Renfield
I'm verklempt.
45 posted on
10/29/2013 5:09:59 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: Renfield
They conclude with high statistical confidence that none of the hominins usually proposed as a common ancestor, such as Homo heidelbergensis, H. erectus and H. antecessor, is a satisfactory match....
Homo heidelbergensis - too drunk
H. erectus - too horny
H. antecessor - too puzzled by what "antecessor" might mean
46 posted on
10/29/2013 5:18:16 PM PDT by
x
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson