Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

makes more sense than any other theory i have seen before

did the archeologists think all the inside bricks were all the same as the outside layer?

it would be silly to think that.

Imagine a brick house- is the interior all brick too? or would you (if you had to) pack it solid with inexpensive material and then put the nice bricks just on the outside?


9 posted on 01/18/2014 11:36:20 AM PST by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. K

There are no bricks in the three great Giza pyramids.

The usual figure — about 2.5 million blocks — was disputed by someone who’d actually taken his time and measured and counted the numbers of visible blocks and number and thickness of the layers, and came up with a figure over 5 million (published in KMT).

Both figures were disputed by Zahi “Zowie” Hawass, who claimed 2.5 was wildly inflated and the number was something more like 500,000, and the average weight about one quarter of the generally accepted figure.

Jean-Pierre Houdin (see the keywords in this topic), an architect, figures that the very necessary ramp used in construction is still there, and internal to the Great Pyramid. I wonder if he’s ever looked at Khafre, the second largest at Giza?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpR7AKKN87E&list=PL9A112AC9F9727C8A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ws4O5LOCI68


23 posted on 01/18/2014 12:35:29 PM PST by SunkenCiv (;http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson