Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

Anyone else click through to the article, “Gravity is Climate”?

Notice they refer to Greenland, loss of ice measured by gravity and yet there’s not a single picture of the mapping of Greenland (let alone any before/after analysis)...

Somehow I just knew there’d be some link to ‘climate change’...


5 posted on 12/15/2014 5:04:27 AM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869
And now for the URL: http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=465

Sorry ...

7 posted on 12/15/2014 5:06:27 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869

The first hint of the density variation was detected, if memory serves, sometime after the IGY (which lasted much more than one year), and was first noticed in the SW Pacific.

Greenland hasn’t lost ice, it has gained it, and since WWII. Systematic measurements using consistent methods haven’t been used for much more then the last 20 years. IOW, the baseline being used for the claim is analogous to trying to draw a mile long straight line with a pencil and one inch ruler.


13 posted on 12/15/2014 5:40:06 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Uniparty my ass. GOPe my ass. ______________________________ Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson