‘Fake but accurate,’ goes along way in our liberal world.
I read an op-ed in our local Gannett generipaper the other day by some black guy
Republicans talked a lot about "drill baby drill" but Obama was the one who made it happen
/puke
Pretty much. You can get statistics to say anything when you have probability to work with. Like we see here, just taking the data from the end of the sample gives you a completely different trend than if you took the whole sample. Both tests were done correctly within their defined boundary conditions, but guess which one is hiding the truth and which one is the more historically accurate. more predictive, and has a narrower confidence interval?