I was just answering your question of how they reconstruct the image - if you want to get into theory that’s a different discussion - and i’m not likely farther from you then you think.
Thank you for the reply. I understand what you’re saying. My problem is that I know the reason why I get a picture on my TV set is because a camera and other equipment feeds a coded digital image into a transmitter and the decoded signal causes a picture to be displayed on my TV screen. The electromagnetic “noise” arriving here from thousands of light years distant is just random noise supposedly being emitted by the random, uncontrolled actions of myriad objects interacting, There is no code, no system, no program to be deciphered. To say that a beautiful color picture of a glorious combination of lights, etc, can be displayed on our monitoring screens from that random noise along with all the other space noise arriving here strains my credulity to the breaking point.
I consider the fact that macro-evolution and AGW, both being promoted as “settled science” are really both blatant lies. Any reasonably intelligent person with a discerning eye and an honest heart innately knows this. So when I’m shown a beautiful photo, and told that it was created from random noise received via radio telescope dishes, I balk. You cannot display intelligent information at this end unless someone or something is transmitting intelligent information at the source. Random radio noise emanating from a maelstrom taking place in deep space is not intelligent information.
Thanks again.