I don’t like the whole climate change debate in general. I think the science gets very lost in the partisanship. But I have always wondered whether the scientific community presenting the case for climate change has not underestimated the ways in which the planet will compensate for higher temperatures in just the way that this article is arguing. And it’s not just the Sahara. There are huge areas of subarctic tundra where tree growth is exploding.
So high carbon leads to warmth, warmth leads to plant growth, plant growth soaks up excess carbon and the warming moderates again.
Huge self adjusting systems? Sounds right to me. It’s a natural.
You can say that again!