How does finding a fossil of an animal with hair and spines reveal the “evolution” of hair and spines? Especially given that it is 60 million years older than evolutionists believed animals should have such attributes. Wouldn’t that suggest that the animals had them all along, rather than evolving them.
True.................where are the proto-hair/spine fossils?..................
there was an error in your post
you used the term evolutionist when you should have used scientist
Evolutionists did not hold that there could not be evidence that was 60 million years older, they merely did not have evidence that this was true. Now they do have the evidence and they are very pleased. However, the earlier mammalian types are almost 100 million years older than this creature, so who knows exactly when these particular attributes first evolved. More evidence needs to be found.