Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

Interesting. It looks like they’ve established that the Plague of Athens and the Antonine Plague could have been Y. pestis, because the pathogen existed then. However, there’s no specific evidence that it actually was.

I think a water-borne infection is far more likely for the Plague of Athens, given that it was triggered by the crowding in the city during the invasion of Attica.


3 posted on 10/24/2015 6:20:14 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Why can't [number][adjective][noun] marry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick
There is some evidence the plague of Athens was typhoid, and the Antoinine plague was smallpox. Historically smallpox was a bigger killer then black plague.

but too often news articles go in for ‘sexy’ diseases like plague or ebola to get headlines.

as for plague...I always thought the epidemic with “hemorrhoids” that affected the Philistines when they stole the ark of the covenant was plague.

and one epidemic that depopulated Mexico in the 1500s was not brought by the Spanish, but a hemorrhagic virus that had struck there in an epidemic before Columbus...

16 posted on 10/25/2015 4:27:32 PM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson