Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Initially scientists had thought it measured around 1.3km in diameter, but now Nasa has said it is more likely to be 0.7km.

This suggests it measures around 1.3km in diameter.

Um, now I AM confused.


3 posted on 12/17/2015 12:49:37 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tet68

Yeah I saw that. Apparently they don’t trust NASA figures in the UK............I don’t blame them...................


5 posted on 12/17/2015 12:50:59 PM PST by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tet68

I saw that too. I guess it means that the writer believes the scientists and not NASA!


8 posted on 12/17/2015 12:52:09 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tet68
Initially scientists had thought it measured around 1.3km in diameter, but now Nasa has said it is more likely to be 0.7km.

This suggests it measures around 1.3km in diameter.

Um, now I AM confused.

Wouldn't be the first time NASA got confused when translating back and forth between metric and English units.

10 posted on 12/17/2015 12:54:50 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: tet68

Should the second ‘diameter’ be ‘circumference’?


13 posted on 12/17/2015 12:57:49 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson