It's clear that you haven't! For one thing, you are conflating fair use with defamation, which is nonsense on stilts. For another, you seem to be defending defamation as a good thing. And eventually, even if defamation is a good thing, you haven't illuminated what the legal standard should be or might be if relaxed from the NYT v Sullivan standard. You also haven't distinguished between "publishing" and "remarking."
The only thing your piece is good for, it to assess your worth as a commentator.
“Free Dominion”