Reporter is a moron, or the scientists are. INTENTIONALITY on the planet Pluto???
My, you are a stickler! No, I don't believe that either the scientists or the reporter were morons, or wished to imply intentionality.
The alternative would have been wordier, and not necessarily more-understandable to typical readers:
It also suggests that the cryovolcanoes were a way possible explanation for Pluto's periodic rejuvenation of its to periodically rejuvenate surface supplies of these volatile ices, which sublimate into the thin atmosphere and are...
Regards,
FAR wordier.
How about “The volcanoes may be the source of blah blah blah on the surface of the planet.”
Sorry, but phraseology that suggests intentionality on a dead planet is just plain incompetent, and stupid.