Heidi’s disagreement with the NAU plan was that it should not be government enforced but left to the private sector. She didn’t disavow dropping the borders and sovereignty. And why was she a member of the CFR anyway? Oh, I know, so she can keep her eye on them, right?
I read all that a long time ago in an attempt to really ferret out the truth.
Heid’s big contribution? Saying that the free markets must control? What do you expect from a Goldman Sachs employee. Free market like NAFTA?
Not one word does she say about being against a North American Union, which she must know gives up all sorts of protections for American workers and American sovereignty.
Is there any agreement with LDS, Doninionists and Seventh Day Adventists about a One World Government with regional Unions as a stepping stone?
I read all that a long time ago in an attempt to really ferret out the truth.
Heid’s big contribution? Saying that the free markets must control? What do you expect from a Goldman Sachs employee. Free market like NAFTA?
Not one word does she say about being against a North American Union, which she must know gives up all sorts of protections for American workers and American sovereignty.
Is there any agreement with LDS, Dominionists and Seventh Day Adventists about a One World Government with regional Unions as a stepping stone?
Fixed typo. One eye fixed. One more to go to be able to see typos a little easier. Sorry.