Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: OldNewYork
Yeah, that's for sure, the Roman Empire in the west (including Britain) only endured for another 250 years, and in the east until the fall of Constantinople in 1453. /s

5 posted on 06/14/2016 1:12:38 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

And how did it end?


7 posted on 06/14/2016 1:24:14 AM PDT by OldNewYork (Operation Wetback II, now with computers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

OldNewYork: “But it doesn’t seem to have saved Rome.”

SunkenCiv: “Roman Empire in the west (including Britain) only endured for another 250 years, and in the east until the fall of Constantinople in 1453. /s”

The historical “tell” as to what was really going on just has to be Constantine the Great’s moving his capital from Rome to Byzantium. Why?

Whatever other reasons, it must be the Empire’s wealth, trade routes, surpluses of food & other vital materials were heavily weighted in the East, whereas costs of maintaining the Western Empire often exceeded revenues.
So under extreme pressures, the West was not financially viable, which explains why their troops eventually didn’t get paid & faded away.

Result: when barbarians overran the West, they faced a Roman Army a mere shadow of what it had been in earlier centuries.

Of course, nothing like that could ever happen these days, right?


26 posted on 06/14/2016 6:07:52 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson