Then why did Alvin Onaka twice refuse to issue a certified verification of Obama having a legally-valid HI BC?
There are 2 verifications that are touted as ending the questions. But the seals on those verifications are not the seal of Alvin Onaka. They are the seal of the HDOH Director, which is defined by statute as 2 1/4” in diameter and having a STAR between the upper and lower banks of words around the perimeter. Onaka’s seal is smaller and has a DOT rather than a star between the banks. I had a friend photograph the seal on the AZ “verification” next to a ruler. It is 2 1/4”.
The seal that Fuddy used on those “verifications” doesn’t certify anything; by statute that seal MUST be used next to the Director’s signature when used to certify/verify documents, and Fuddy’s signature is nowhere on those “verifications”.
So why did she use that seal, when it didn’t certify anything without her signature? Or why didn’t she use her signature next to the seal, so that it really would have been lawfully certified?
The only explanation that makes sense is that she put her seal without her signature, so that the world would be deceived into thinking Onaka certified those documents and confirmed a valid HI BC for Obama. When in reality he refused to issue a certified verification of the existence of a valid HI BC for Obama - and the statutes only allow that refusal if there IS NO valid HI BC.
IOW, Onaka twice legally confirmed that there IS NO legally-valid HI BC for Obama. But Loretta Fuddy illegally used her seal to cover up that fact and deceive the world into thinking Onaka did the EXACT OPPOSITE.
Onaka gave us our answer, which is clear as a bell when you remove the interference from Loretta Fuddy - who also illegally (and in a coordinated effort with Obama’s legal team) conspired to restrict the public from access to certified copies of their own STANDARD (long-form) birth certificates, which is mandated by both statute and the HDOH Administrative Rules.
Furthermore, I asked to see any records at the HDOH that defined what would be on certified copies of standard birth certificates and was told that no records existed. So then the HDOH posted a “memo” that was created that very same day (the day Obama released the online image) claiming that many years ago it had been decided they would include only the ABBREVIATED BC info when a STANDARD BC was requested. I had already been given a response earlier saying that no such memo existed. And the policy itself is not allowed to be in effect if not published and posted to the HDOH website.
Loretta Fuddy illegally conspired with Obama’s attorneys to break Hawaii law. In addition, Fuddy deliberately deceived the AZ and KS SOS’s into thinking that Onaka gave them a certified “verification” when in fact Onaka refused to certify anything. That is document fraud, and it stares us right in our faces.
I should clarify: My request for the HDOH records stating what would be on a certified standard BC was made and answered many months before Fuddy, conspiring with Bob Bauer, tried to pass off as real a 1995? “memo” saying that only info on the short-form BC would be included when a certified standard BC was requested.
IOW, months earlier the HDOH had said there were no memos/documents describing what would be on a certified standard BC. It was not just a mistake/misstatement, because by HI statute they HAVE to include on their standard BC’s ALL of the information required by the CDC - and I read them the riot act for trying to claim at that time that it was OK for them to deny access to standard BC’s AS DEFINED IN HI STATUTE (including all the info required by the CDC, for birth certificates).
And then, the same day as Obama releases his online image, they put on their website a so-called 1995 memo saying they’ll only give certified copies of ABBREVIATED BC’s when asked for a STANDARD BC - and the creation date of that document is the same day as Obama posted his online image. They had already, months before, denied to me that such a document existed.
In addition, Onaka has since dropped a red flag for those who know enough about the system to catch it.
In a public conference he spoke about the online image that Obama posted, using the claims on it to explain the business process of how birth certificates are created. He noted that the BC# posted (10641) shows that Obama’s BC is found in the 10th volume, on page 641.
Anybody who knows about the HDOH volumes knows there is no such thing as page 641. They only include 500 BC’s in each volume, as HDOH Director Fukino publicly stated.
IOW, Onaka publicly stated that Obama’s BC is on a non-existent page.
Another red flag by Alvin Onaka.
Why won’t we ever believe this guy when he tells us the truth?