Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Melian; reed13k
-- Thank you for that information on the ships. --

The designers of Arleigh Burke incorporated lessons learned from the Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruisers, the latter which was deemed too expensive to continue building and too difficult to further upgrade. With the Arleigh Burke class, the U.S. Navy also returned to all-steel construction. An earlier generation had combined a steel hull with an innovative superstructure made of lighter aluminum to reduce top weight, but the lighter metal proved vulnerable to cracking. Aluminum is also less fire-resistant than steel; a 1975 fire aboard USS Belknap gutted her aluminum superstructure. Battle damage to Royal Navy ships exacerbated by their aluminum superstructures during the 1982 Falklands War supported the decision to use steel.
Arleigh Burke-class destroyer - Wikipedia
1,025 posted on 03/06/2018 5:53:23 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1010 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Hhmmmm. Sounds like steel hulls could be a factor to me.


1,046 posted on 03/06/2018 6:15:32 PM PST by Melian ("Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." -Gimli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1025 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson