Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interstellar Trade Is Possible
Tough SF ^ | 3/21/17

Posted on 03/16/2018 9:36:20 PM PDT by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: jmacusa

“If you could build a craft that could travel at or near the speed of light you just can’t just ‘’hit the brakes’’ like it was a car. If you did you’d be a smear on the inside wall/bulkhead or what ever of your ship.”

That’s what inertial dampeners are for. Duh.


41 posted on 03/17/2018 5:48:11 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (The first step in ending the war on white people is to recognize it exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

Good point. Going from 0.8c to 0 in a stopping distance of a few hundred AU... the deceleration forces alone would probably kill you.


42 posted on 03/17/2018 5:52:04 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Fuel and transport cost money, so even if Proxima Centauri is having a sale on Unobtainium for $1/pound, when you include shipping the cost will be $100,000,000,001.


43 posted on 03/17/2018 6:20:15 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (The first step in ending the war on white people is to recognize it exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Pretty interesting one year-old article that's never been posted here. If he's got his economics wrong, let's hear it. I'm not qualified to judged

I don't think interstellar commerce would work like that. The reason is that you don't wait 50 years for the next delivery. You have a ship launch every year and pretty soon your delivery time frames are annual. Yes, there's a big jump for the first batch but after that the time frame dwindles. There is always the option of a lost ship or goods exposed to space, but then you would only ship the most durable items anyway.

44 posted on 03/17/2018 7:04:28 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Without inter-dimensional travel, there is no possible way to conduct commerce with other star systems, let alone other galaxies.

You need to able to go from one point to another and back within a reasonable amount of time.

Higher dimensions allow virtual instant travel time between two points. I’m sure some brainiac will find the secrete in the future.


45 posted on 03/17/2018 7:10:35 AM PDT by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc; Covenantor

Read a sci-fi short once where some advanced civilizations would automatically attack any other such they encountered because the other was completely inscrutable, unpredictable and as such posed an unacceptable existential threat. No time to study them. You snooze, you lose. Instantaeous annihilation for just revealing your presence. Totally creeped me out.


46 posted on 03/17/2018 7:23:58 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

See Cixin Liu’s The Three Body Problem, The Dark Forest and Deaths End.

What you relate is the Dark Forest Theory. If you make noise in the forest, predators will hear and come for a meal.

It this story the predators do not actually come to the meal but being cautions lest other predators hear them, send a seed which grows to encompass the entire solar system and converts it into a 2-dimensional object. Problem solved. Predator remain hidden.


47 posted on 03/17/2018 8:38:18 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

“Of all the gin joints in the universe....bar fight”

;>)


48 posted on 03/17/2018 9:13:19 AM PDT by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

Aren’t you putting the cart before the horse, as it were?


49 posted on 03/17/2018 10:39:49 AM PDT by jmacusa ("Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Conan the Librarian

I wonder what would happen if you were going .5c and ran head on into another object that was going .5c ?


50 posted on 03/17/2018 10:51:48 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
So one of the methods I’ve seen involves unfurling a light sail that’s hundreds of miles in diameter when you get near your destination star and the light pressure on your sail will slow you down.

So... where would you keep that light sail, in the glovebox ? How many crew members would it take to unfurl it ?

51 posted on 03/17/2018 10:56:28 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

OY! It would be such a mess!


52 posted on 03/17/2018 11:00:03 AM PDT by Conan the Librarian (The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

You’d want to keep the acceleration/deceleration at or below 1g if humans were aboard, especially for the length of time it takes to go to and from 0.8 light speed. To get there at 1g, it would take 283 days, and covering a distance of 19,600 AU’s (0.31 ly). Double that for the deceleration leg. But where does a spaceship get the energy to do this, keeping in mind that the more fuel you’re carrying, the heavier and slower your spaceship will be? I can’t imagine doing it with anything less than some futuristic super fuel like antimatter.


53 posted on 03/17/2018 11:19:48 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Kinetic energy is one half the mass times the velocity squared.
E=½mv².
A one ton mass going half the speed of light (93,000 miles per second) will have a kinetic energy of 1.12x1019 joules, which is equivalent to a 2,685 megaton nuclear explosion. That would be the energy released if it came to a sudden stop.
54 posted on 03/17/2018 11:44:44 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; LibWhacker; KevinDavis; annie laurie; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; ...
Thanks fieldmarshaldj for the ping, LibWhacker for the topic. Definitely want to check the sell-by dates. Unless the trade is in cryptocurrency.
 
X-Planets
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·

55 posted on 03/17/2018 12:15:51 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Interesting article. It mentions mining asteroids. Think that would have a quicker return on investment. Few if any of the technologies discussed exist yet, but they’re not far off. At least not in terms of a civilization. His math seems solid.

That, or we could just invent a warp drive. This is not entirely snark. I know at least two people who are seriously working on the physics behind actually doing so. The trick is that while matter or energy cannot move faster than the speed of light, space itself can.


56 posted on 03/24/2018 8:45:28 AM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaTech

Time dialation actually works the other way around. If you are on a ship moving at .9c and going to a system 10 light years away and back, from the outside it will look like the round trip takes 18 years. From the inside of the ship it will take a lot less. (Sorry, too lazy to do the math on a Saturday.)


57 posted on 03/24/2018 8:51:58 AM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

It’s worse. If you are going 0.5c and run into a stationary 1 gram dust particle, the released energy from impact will basically be equivalent to a large nuke.


58 posted on 03/24/2018 8:53:36 AM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: piytar
If you are going 0.5c and run into a stationary 1 gram dust particle, the released energy from impact will basically be equivalent to a large nuke.

Pedal to the metal. Is better to 'push through' the impact. Go Full Light Speed, or faster. Then the energy can't catch you.

; )

59 posted on 03/24/2018 3:09:38 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson