Posted on 03/22/2018 6:22:46 PM PDT by ransomnote
They don't get it, but I don't care. I live to amuse myself. :)
Just trying to keep the faith that POTUS TRUMP'S priorities at heart are our's too and that he has a plan to redeem the hideous parts of this bill one way or another. He's not exactly a wimpy push-over about his priorities--though he may feint now and then, imho.
Gaslighting is a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, hoping to make them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target’s belief.[1][2]
Instances may range from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred up to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. The term owes its origin to the 1938 Patrick Hamilton play Gas Light and its 1940 and 1944 film adaptations. The term has been used in clinical and research literature,[3][4] as well as in political commentary
As in say ... a family--say father and teen kids conspiring to say things askew from the reality the mother perceives in order to get her committed and out of their hair?
But what does that have to do with gas lights?
They have something to do with gaslighting or nit-picking?
Gaslighting is a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, hoping to make them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target's belief.
The term owes its origin to the 1938 Patrick Hamilton play Gas Light and its 1940 and 1944 film adaptations. The term has been used in clinical and research literature,[3][4] as well as in political commentary.[5][6]
Interesting, they have any theories about it over there?
Ahhhh. That explains it. Thanks big.
What exactly is a “nit” and why do people pick them anyway?
From a satire point, yeah that was excellent.
Reading about the spending bill . . . absolutely depressing. Some one commented and said . . . when your opponents are cheering, you are losing!
Many many of the anons will walk away from Q if POTUS signs. There is nothing good about his bill from what I am hearing so far.
Ask Cboldt, he is the expert! LoL
Thanks.
Nice that it didn’t have anything to do with uhhh strange activities between men.
IIRC.
Maybe it is just a gambit, part of the game to out as many RINOs as possible. Dunno. I think it sucks if he signs it but others say it is only for 6 months and a lot can change in 6 months.
I just don’t see how it fits in the plan, however, since we really don’t know what the plan is, it’s hard to say.
Assange is loaded for bear! Joseph Mudsup?? (Sp) Great twitter page full of fascinating riddles, links and news.
Assange believes this JM guy is “odd”, connection wise I presume.
And if it ain't true, it damn well oughtta be.
Thanks...
Hey man—in the grand scale of things, this bill doesn't really mean jack sh-t if your post #129 is accurate.
let's keep our eye on the ball—like the SEAL teams hopefully are—and let the Dems and GOPe worry about the Bread and Circuses.
I wouldn't care if President Trump signed a spending bill TEN TIMES larger than this piece of garbage, if it meant that the Deep State, Hillary et al all get their long overdue comeuppance. That's my focus. Everything else is reeking horse sh-t compared to that...
Wow, it seems like little hogg boy is off his meds.
David Hogg attacked pro-gun politicians and the NRA, saying, “It just makes me think what sick f***ers out there want to continue to sell more guns, murder more children, and honestly just get reelected.”
“What type of s***ty person does that?” Hogg continued. “They could have blood from children splattered all over their faces and they wouldn’t take action, because they all still see these dollar signs.”
Hogg said he is going to make sure that “those f***ers aren’t getting reelected.”
Ingrid Bergman is married to Charles Boyer and he tries to make her think she’s going crazy. Joseph Cotten of Scotland Yard sneaks into her house while husband is up in attic, and the gaslights flicker and Cotten confirms they did. This restores Ingrid’s sanity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.