YOU LIE. My words are reasonably clear if (always) imperfect.
I say there is not sufficient reason(s) to believe Q is what he is claimed to be.
That does NOT imply that I know “What Q really truly is” — only that I (claim to know pretty well) what Q is NOT.
You really need a course in basic logic and reasoning.
Hmmmm you trolls really do feel threatened by me, even though I am just one-offing very casual thoughts and impressions. If I ever decide to go into some serious debunking of this crap you will truly never recover. ha ha...
With all due respect, Enchante, you lie. You are right about one thing. Your words ARE reasonably clear;
(though I continue to affirm that I just don’t follow it all closely enough to reach any firm conclusion).
I say there is not sufficient reason(s) to believe Q is what he is claimed to be.
You may have said that, but you also said the above, which in and of itself as a stand-alone statement, disqualifies you from speaking on the topic with any authority. I repeat: You are debunked.
You really need a course in basic logic and reasoning.
Well, somebody does anyway.
I am just one-offing very casual thoughts and impressions.
One-offing,eh? Well, now know that your one-offing very casual thoughts are wind and not to be considered by serious scholars or lesser Oracles.
If I ever decide to go into some serious debunking of this crap you will truly never recover. ha ha...
Scary.
:)