Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SpaceX nabs $130 million to launch an Air Force satellite with Falcon Heavy
Tech Crunch ^ | Kirsten Korosec

Posted on 06/21/2018 10:18:28 PM PDT by BenLurkin

Under the contract, the Hawthorne, Calif.-based rocket company founded by Elon Musk will launch the Air Force Space Command-52 satellite to its intended orbit. The contract includes launch vehicle production and mission, as well as integration, launch operations and spaceflight worthiness activities, according to a notice posted by the U.S. Department of Defense.

The work, which will be performed at SpaceX’s headquarters, the Kennedy Space Center in Florida and in McGregor, Texas, is expected to be completed by September 2020. The mission is planned to be launched from Kennedy Space Center.

Two proposals were received by the DOD in the competitive bidding process.

(Excerpt) Read more at techcrunch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: falconheavy; spacex; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 06/21/2018 10:18:29 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

You mean “Space Force” Satellite...


2 posted on 06/21/2018 11:56:25 PM PDT by GraceG ("Q is dead, been dead a for a while...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Heck of a lot cheaper than a shuttle launch, and with virtually no risk to human life.

It’s one thing to risk some hardware on antiquated chemical propulsion, but quite another to risk seven human lives at a time. Or four or however many the “new” generation of capsules may carry.

We need to get real with the technology or just...stop it. Carrying on like this is criminal.


3 posted on 06/22/2018 12:26:17 AM PDT by JustaTech (A mind is a terrible thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaTech

Shovel more Federal funds at “free market” Musk.

Clever.


4 posted on 06/22/2018 2:10:20 AM PDT by cgbg (Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Just how much government money is this guy allowed to get his hands on?

Seems to me like he’s just another crony, capitalist liberal hypocrite.


5 posted on 06/22/2018 4:02:41 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

You are dead on right.


6 posted on 06/22/2018 5:13:07 AM PDT by Dartoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

Musk will take this money and throw it into a hole in the ground...


7 posted on 06/22/2018 5:23:25 AM PDT by Rebelbase ( Tagline disabled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

More expensive CGI pictures.


8 posted on 06/22/2018 5:25:27 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Two proposals were received by the DOD in the competitive bidding process.”

Yeah, I overbid that one. I also lost the bid on converting the Mars rover to Uber.


9 posted on 06/22/2018 5:43:46 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Proud member of the DWN party. (Deplorable Wing Nut))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

But break off a nice chunk for himself before he covers it up. All while extolling the virtues of all things electric made by his companies and why the taxpayer should fund more of his research and production.

Face it, his PowerWall, is nothing but battery backups. He uses fancy lithium-ion batteries, as opposed to good old fashioned, deep cycle marine batteries that are a helluva lot cheaper. Either way, it’s just solar power with battery storage, nothing more.


10 posted on 06/22/2018 5:48:24 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
In most instances I would agree with you. Not a Musk fan.

But in this case SpaceX is contracted to deliver a satellite. Could NASA deliver it to orbit cheaper?

11 posted on 06/22/2018 5:55:03 AM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

For a site that supports free market solutions there are a lot of people who are critical of SpaceX

The other competitor for the bid was United Launch Alliance, which is a joint venture of Lockheed-Martin and Boeing. They would have charged 2x3 times as much as SpaceX for the equivalent heavy rocket.

NASA doesn’t build their own rockets. They never have. The construction has always been sub-contracted to private companies. This is no different with SpaceX. As long as they can deliver the goods cheaper than other companies that should be celebrated.

Now Tesla on the other hand, that is a siphon of government money.


12 posted on 06/22/2018 7:02:19 AM PDT by sloanrb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

Get off this website, it’s not CGI, it’s not fake, STOP DISCREDITING FREE REPUBLIC YOU CONSPIRACY THEORIST NUTJOB!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5K7HKFkZ8o
SUCK ON IT!


13 posted on 06/26/2018 7:43:15 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Hey genius, you do realize that if Musk wasn’t competing in this market, this satellite would be launching on a disposable Delta IV Heavy at a cost more than TWICE what the Falcon Heavy can do it for, right?! SpaceX is REDUCING THE COST TO TAXPAYERS, GET IT THROUGH YOUR HEAD!


14 posted on 06/26/2018 7:45:25 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

NO, HE WON’T, HE’LL TAKE IT AND LAUNCH THE SATELLITE WITH THE VERY REAL AND REUSABLE FALCON HEAVY ROCKET FOR LESS THAN HALF THE COST OF THE EXPENDABLE DELTA IV HEAVY ROCKET!


15 posted on 06/26/2018 7:46:37 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

“Force satellite with Falcon Heavy, qaz123 wrote:
Just how much government money is this guy allowed to get his hands on?”

Try LESS THAN HALF THE MONEY THE NEXT MOST POWERFUL ROCKET WOULD COST! YOU PEOPLE ARE HYPOCRITES!


16 posted on 06/26/2018 7:47:23 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter

Google Chicago Elon Musk hole in the ground


17 posted on 06/26/2018 7:57:10 AM PDT by Rebelbase ( Tagline disabled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter

Just for grins ...

Possible Falcon Heavy payloads:

LEO: 140,700lb
GTO: 58,900lb
Mars: 37,000lb
Pluto: 7,700lb

Possible Delta IV Heavy payloads:
LEO: 63,470lb
GTO: 31,350lb

Falcon Heavy will put almost as much in GTO as Delta IV Heavy will put in LEO. They’re barely in the same category.


18 posted on 06/26/2018 7:58:22 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Google SpaceX you genius, you just referenced a different company. The $130 million goes to SPACEX for LAUNCHING A SATELLITE not to the BORING COMPANY TO DRILL A HOLE IN THE GROUND. And that $130 million price tag is less than half the cost of launching an expendable Delta IV Heavy. You’re welcome.


19 posted on 06/26/2018 7:59:59 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter

Both companies are Elon Musk.


20 posted on 06/26/2018 9:46:36 AM PDT by Rebelbase ( Tagline disabled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson