Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith



To me, one proof for q consists of a sequential three-parter:

1. q claims that it is an insider of the Trump admin.

2. Trump has enough media awareness and pop-culture awareness to know about 1 above.

3. Trump has not denied 1 above.

Until Trump denies 1 above, I say, let q ride.



122 posted on 07/25/2018 9:39:54 PM PDT by Vision Thing (Hell ain't waitin' on a guy like me. - Pat Green)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: Vision Thing

“let q ride. “

Yeah, my opinion too.
But I do think there is better use of Freepers’ talents.


123 posted on 07/25/2018 9:44:48 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

To: Vision Thing

Why would he bother addressing it?

It’s a ‘win-win’ for him to leave it alone entirely: if it’s bringing people to his side, he wins without addressing it; and at the same time, he doesn’t need to get bogged down in the complications that would ensue if he expressed an opinion about it. None of that means at all that Q is an “insider” or that Trump approves of the thing.

There are so many leaps of logic in this ‘Q’ belief, it’s kind of amazing.


126 posted on 07/25/2018 10:05:20 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson