This is the basics of the link Q left about Brennan spying. It’s from 2014. Check out who was the head of the Intelligence Comm. and who called for Brennan’s head on a platter. From The Guardian, July 31, 2014.
___________________________________________
The director of the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, issued an extraordinary apology to leaders of the US Senate intelligence committee on Thursday, conceding that the agency employees spied on committee staff and reversing months of furious and public denials.
Brennan acknowledged that an internal investigation had found agency security personnel transgressed a firewall set up on a CIA network, which allowed Senate committee investigators to review agency documents for their landmark inquiry into CIA torture.
Among other things, it was revealed that agency officials conducted keyword searches and email searches on committee staff while they used the network.
The admission brings Brennan’s already rocky tenure at the head of the CIA under renewed question. One senator on the panel said he had lost confidence in the director, although the White House indicated its support for a man who has been one of Barack Obama’s most trusted security aides.
Advertisement
Sponsored by USAA Insurance
Sponsored video
Watch to learn more
CIA spokesman Dean Boyd acknowledged that agency staff had improperly monitored the computers of committee staff members, who were using a network the agency had set up, called RDINet. “Some CIA employees acted in a manner inconsistent with the common understanding reached between [the committee] and the CIA in 2009 regarding access to the RDINet,” he said.
Asked if Brennan had or would offer his resignation, a different CIA spokesman, Ryan Trapani, replied: “No.”
In March, the committee chairwoman, Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, accused the agency of violating constitutional boundaries by spying on the Senate.
Sign up for Guardian Today US edition: the day’s must-reads sent directly to you
Read more
Feinstein said the vindication, from CIA inspector general David Buckley, and Brennan’s apology were “positive first steps,” suggesting that the director had further work to do before she would consider the matter closed.
She stopped short of calling for Brennan’s resignation. But her committee colleague, Democrat Mark Udall of Colorado, said Brennan should go. “I have no choice but to call for the resignation of CIA director John Brennan,” Udall said after a briefing on the inspector general’s findings.
I do wonder why DiFi would care. I would have assumed they were on the same team but I guess they all want to control each other. Did Brennan find her communications re China? I don’t understand how this pond full of sharks all sort themselves out - are in they in groups categorized by criminal codes violated or levels of betrayal or “handlers”?
I’ve wondered that about George Bush/Hillary etc. If all are on the same team, who decided to “let” Bush win over other sharks that year? I remember reading a (wikileaks) email from HIllary groveling to Lyn De Rothschild because Hillary accidentally scheduled a social event to occur at the same time that Lyn’s event was scheduled. Is it simple little slights or degree of groveling and servitude that help one advance? Curious.
I was hoping the answer was going to be new director but remembering Feinstein’s “shock” ... now, with what we know about the spy embedded in/to her, reads more like, “you’re not supposed to be spying on me! you’re supposed to have been spying on the R’s”.