Q Anon: 09/26/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 09/26/18 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

	“Trust The Plan”
YouTube	President Trump	This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube	Joe Masepoes	Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
Threadreader	Jason Wright	Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Threadreader	ImperatorRex	A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming: major Swamp Draining. - overview
Twitter	Paul Serran	What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Article	Sundance	Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Thread	Martin Geddes	WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
	“Pay Attention”
Thread	Qmap.pub	Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread	Qanon.app	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Thread	Qanonposts.com	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Website	We-go-all.net	Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website	Qntmpkts.keybase.pub	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
	“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread	Anonymous	QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Oracles	Bagster	Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon	Swordmaker	LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website	Whitehouse	Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website	FBI	vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website	State Dept.	foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table	Anonymous	Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
	“Power to the People”
YouTube	Praying Medic	Series of videos explaining Q-drops
Twitter	Praying Medic	Immediate reactions to Q-drops
YouTube	Dustin Nemos	Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links
Twitter	ImperatorRex	Includes Q-drop reactions
Twitter	Neonrevolt	Includes highly detailed, investigative Q-drop reactions
Thread	SkyPilot	Story of Q - collection of Q information
	“Silent Majority No More”
Website	White House	Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website	Congress	Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Website	roserambles.org	Q Cards
Thread	Little Jeremiah	Memes
	“Fight, Fight, Fight!”
YouTube	President Reagan	A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images
YouTube	President Kennedy	The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies

[philman_36]

The link is to an article with the video (2:37 so not that long) at the top.
Read the article if you so choose. The same info is written therein.

[reed13k]

concur on the assessment

timeline discussion was disjointed at best so hard to follow

[philman_36]

The meat... Bizarrely, the person conducting the polygraph — who was a third-party examiner and not a law enforcement official — had Ford scribble down her nearly 40-year-old memory of the drunken party, and then asked her two vague questions.
Those two questions were: “Is any part of your statement false?” and “Did you make up any part of your statement?” The potatoes...IMO...Instead, Ford was simply asked if she she believed her own hand-written statement.

[JockoManning]

No. Whether literal or a metaphor, this is part of the reality many of us function with and in.

Mark Taylor, Kim Clement and several others over the last 20-30 years have declared prophetic assertions which were clearly about Trump by name or for whom Trump was the only individual to fit their assertions at all.

For us, it would be denial of a very important set of puzzle pieces; a very important part of literal reality; a very important part of the whole picture--such that it would handicap, diminish, distort & tarnish good reality testing.

Asking us to dialogue, analyze, perceive without such puzzle pieces would be akin to asking an individual:
--without dangly bits to quit acting like a testosterone ridden man;
--or a conservative to quit referring to The Constitution & limited government; or a woman to ignore her motherly affections & perspective;
--or a Christian the denial of Creation, the Virgin Birth, Death & Resurrection.

No thanks. Not in this lifetime.

Perhaps you could put a muzzle on your hyper-sensitivity to such aspects of life. Your sensibilities are NOT the definers, arbiters, policemen, judges, juries, executioners of our reality. We make allowances for your particulars, you can make allowances for ours--graciously, or not.

You ask us to lay aside a major aspect of our cosmology, our reality, our perceptions, your analytical skill-set. For what? For your hyper-sensitivity and aversion to a key aspect of our reality. Tough tacos.

Super-rationalism is NOT the only way to perceive, analyze and form hypotheses about reality. It can be demonstrated that it is not even the most reliable or most accurate predictor of the whole of, every aspect of reality. Yet, we do not demand that you leave it out of discussions and quit operating in your dialogues with it as your foundation.

[Yulee]

The potatoes...IMO...Instead, Ford was simply asked if she she believed her own hand-written statement.
*****************
And her statement never mentions Kavanaugh. Repeat, her statement never mentions Kavanaugh.

So she can write down that she was assaulted (or an incident took place sometime around 1982), but that is the only thing proved by the lie detector.

As if a lie detector result can be entered into a court of law.

[JockoManning]

But again, they have no clue. AFAIK, Trump/TeamQ hold the keys to the file cabinets. All they need to do is start dropping a $hitload of dimes on Harris and DiFi. Neither will last long under righteous scrutiny.

ABSOLUTELY!

[Defiant]

It is scary that this lunacy is happening in a US Senate hearing on live nationwide TV. It is a sign that the nation as a serious entity has jumped the shark. LIke when one of the Roman emperors made his horse proconsul. He did it as an in your face to the Roman senate, to show that he could and they couldn’t do anything about it. He had total control. Democrats are trying to show that they have total control and will do anything, including name their horse to the Supreme Court, to keep it. And the people who support them will be fine with that.

The only thin that can restore some semblance of seriousness to our country would be if Kavanaugh is confirmed, and those who put together this conspiracy to destroy a man who has lived an exemplary life go to jail for perjury, suborning perjury, fraud and whatever other crimes can be asserted from this event. Then and only then can we start to put the pieces back together. I hope Trump is calling Wray right now getting the warrants and the investigative teams put together.

[ichabod1]

That’s ok, she’s also making a mockery of anybody that got raped in high school.

[JockoManning]

“Being guilty until proven innocent is a very dangerous road to go down....” - President Donald Trump

For sure.

[reed13k]

C-span devolved to a “let me tell you my story” session during the lunch break - I had to shut it off till they reconvene. Interestingly it seemed about 1/2 and 1/2 on whether they thought Judge K was the perpetrator or she was projecting on someone else.

[philman_36]

Blumenthal trying to set a narrative to the public...IMO.

[JockoManning]

Agreed. And there are still plenty of liberal hidiots there. Don’t post there either.

[defconw]

What would preclude us from going back to advise and consent, using affidavits only?

[ichabod1]

o no he can’t direct the DoJ to investigate somebody

[ez]

Three lies so far ... 1) she could hear conversation downstairs 2) she is afraid to fly because of her trauma. 3) she took the polygraph the day of her grandmothers funeral.

[philman_36]

Somebody needs to ask Blumenthal if he believes the written statements submitted under penalty of perjury by the others that Ford said were there?
Is their testimony not credible?

[JockoManning]

“Feinswine is looking horrible”

How can you tell the difference?

Blessed relieving GUFFAWS to that one! Thanks.

[Dartoid]

Cletus sure doesn’t need me to speak for him. I’m sure he will have a better response....but that was sure a lengthy retort to him when all he was saying was that the prophet test doesn’t apply to journalists (my take away). And he is right. Context. Context. Context.

Good for you that your worldview is formed by your spiritual walk. Much respect.

We are all in this together. One team. Keep focused on the prize. Winning.

[Right-wing Librarian]

It is reported that she has 10 kids, never married....

[JockoManning]

Same here. What a wretched farce.