You make the case so eloquently. Listening to her, for me the "something's not right" moment was when she self-diagnosed how a victim responds to a trauma, using all of the fancy language.
She cam across to me as someone who refuses to acknowledge consciously that she had a role in whatever happened to her.
Is it just me, or did her halting, emotional, high-pitched, child’s voice seem over-acted and just plain creepy???
Correct.
Which is why I said “When confronted with the overwhelming contradicting evidence of those who were supposedly there, she impeached the witnesses, or minimize them, or made convincing reasons why they answered as they did.”