feh...
Posted on 11/09/2018 1:13:45 PM PST by Heff
No where, it is entirely legal.
Congress has a gigantic fund, paid for by taxpayers, just for that purpose.
“where is this going?”
The purpose is to scare off potential future non-establishment candidates.
“The purpose is to scare off potential future non-establishment candidates.”
I think that goal was achieved on week one of the Trump presidency. The mueller coup cemented any doubts.
Most of Trumps campaign funds were from donations, not his own money.
They better hope they have a plan to take down a few million enraged berserk Deplorables at the same time...
This article was written to distract from active voter fraud
The chance of the senate voting to impeach is as likely as Elvis having dinner with me tonight
If they keep stirring up charges against Trump.. hillary and obama are yet to be indicted.. they keep one ongoing.. hill and bo will also be ongoing.
2 can play that gsme.
“The chance of the senate voting to impeach is as likely as Elvis having dinner with me tonight”
I hear that a lot. I guess people haven’t been paying attention the last 3 years. The rinos and neverTrumpers haven’t stopped trying to undermine and get rid of Trump. They want him gone as much or more than the dems do. If mueller gives them a legal fig leaf to pull that convict & remove lever, they’ll do it. They’ll be upholding the rule of law dontchaknow.
This is not that hard. It’s only hard because people repeat “the senate will never remove” canard ad nauseum across social media.
Not happening
feh...
Dear WSJ,
NO.
ONE.
CARES.
Sincerely,
EVERYONE
I’ve got the same question I had before: where’s the scandal?
Then if that doesn’t work, they’ll try to get him for lying.”””
WHEN did they have Trump under oath?
I don’t think they ever did. ONLY can go after him for lying UNDER Oath.
Anybody see on this same website WSJ, the newsbit about FBI going after a company the new acting AG Whitaker was an advisor at that supposedly scammed people out of millions of dollars?
Here it comes, digging up dirt on the new AG.
They’re trying to say that this “impacted an election” which may not be legal.
That said, WHAT ABOUT THAT SLUSH FUND CONGRESS HAS TO ***PAY OFF*** SEXUAL ACCUSERS!!!!???!?!?!?!?!?!?
We NEVER hear about whom has been accused of what....how is that NOT impacting an election??? If they push this we should demand that ALL of the information becomes public.
Obama had to pay a 375,000 dollar campaign finance fine because they found he had committed campaign finance violations.
I believe Kamala Harris had to pay a biggie fine too but don’t remember the amount off the top of my head.
They haven’t found Trump to have committed it.
marking
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.