Gee, why would they have a problem with people deciding if they're 'likable'? Lol...
With men, it's the "Is he the type of guy that you'd like to sit down and have a beer with?" question ...
Short answer: NO
If you are a Democrat, a woman, and elected to something, that pretty much 100% pegs you as a b*tch.
Go ahead. Remind every man in America of his ex-wife.
This is reverse sexism - we are supposed to like Hillary because she’s female, and overlook the corruption and condescending behavior.
Typical leftist drivel.
Leftist women tend to be embarrassingly stupid. Yet they manage to win elections. Presumably, that is because the dem/socialist electorate is as embarrassingly stupid as the candidates.
Likeability has become an important factor for Democrats since, with the exceptions of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrats no longer make policy pronouncements on issues.
In 2016, Bernie Sanders proposed free college tuition for every American — yet Hillary Clinton never stood up and took the opposite position. So there was no debate on that or any other issue. Which left “likeability” the principal criterion for judging Hillary.
You’d think that potential candidates like Elizabeth Warren, who seems even more unlikeable than Hillary, would have learned to offer something — a promise to nationalize the U.S. banking system if elected, for example — besides likeability of which she has so little.
The Left would love to nationalize the banking system. So the first Democratic presidential candidate who offers to do so will soar into prominence and become the star of the primary season.
Will any of the 20-plus Democratic hopefuls promise to do such a thing or anything similar? Maybe Bernie Sanders will come through. Otherwise, the 20-plus hopefuls are likely to engage in a year-and-a-half-long mean-spirited mudslinging contest among themselves to try to establish their superior likeability compared to their opponents.