The answer to your questions are in post 26. Very clearly.
Note that you only had the video to go by when you attacked the girl because she supposedly struck first. Now that we see that wasn’t true and he was the first to assault someone, in the same video you used to attack the girl, you change the narrative.
That’s my best effort to open your eyes. I can you see you like to play in the mud and not admit when you err. Have fun now playing with yourself.
Did I not establish that for you?
How did my narrative change? I said long ago that no one, that would include you, have any idea what occurred in the seconds/minute leading up to the camera being turned on. The camera was clearly turned on while the incident was already in progress. No? Not to mention there were reports there was fighting or a fight and the adult intervened or was somehow involved.
What narrative change are ya talking about?
I think he was either coming or going from the mall with his family and decided to intervene in someone else’s beef. I say this because at the beginning of the video he yells ‘break it up’. Then, at the 4-6 second mark, HE IS THE FIRST ONE to lay hands on someone (probably the girl who them pushed him) when he spins someone out of the way, seemingly to confront someone else who I’m guessing yelled a profanity at him.
Ahhh, I was kind of looking for a yes or no. But that's OK. Your wordy evasive responses are entertaining.☺