>>you must be an aggrieved party, meaning you must show direct immediate harm from what is happening (i.e., building the wall).
Well, I have to say they’ve got that. A wall would cause direct immediate harm to the Dems because their supply of drugs, trafficked humans, MS-13 gang members available for murder-for-hire, etc., would be severely impacted.
Isn’t there a claim of a federal easement 100 yards from the actual border point all along both borders?