Posted on 03/17/2019 8:37:16 PM PDT by conservative98
Beto ORourke is many things. But he is definitely not a fighter. And thats why it would be a huge mistake for the Democrats to nominate him to take on President Trump in 2020 for the White House. Simply put, Beto cannot beat Donald Trump. Someone else, maybe. But not Trump.
Its not Betos fault hes not a fighter. After all, hes led a very charmed, privileged life as a white male. Hes faced very little adversity. He didnt come from nothing. He didnt have to fight and scrape his way to the top because of his gender or race or economic circumstances. He has no experience doing battle in high-stakes business or leading tough negotiations. He hasnt ever fought for working people in contentious situations.
I understand why he says he wants his campaign to be only positive: he hates confrontation, because he has so little experience in it. He doesnt like to get his uniform dirty.
Sadly, you cant beat Trump by preaching about puppies and daisies and reciting poetry. Being positive and singing Kumbaya doesnt work. You beat Trump only by getting down in the gutter with him, taking an enormous amount of punishment but giving more than you take. My fear is that by putting Beto up against Trump, the Democrats would be choosing one of the few politicians in America who could elevate Trump, both as a man and as a fighter. Thats because, for all Betos good looks, energy and enthusiasm, he comes across as a cheerleader. And a cheerleader doesnt beat Trump.
Let me explain. Donald Trump is in many ways the kryptonite for the Democratic party.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.us ...
Beto the Beta-Male
And who’s the tough on the Democratic side who is up for this fight? Warren? Booker? Harris? A small army of lightweights.
But, but, he is a fake hispanic. Does that count?
You’re right on. Yep, very sickening.
True, but what exactly is Avenetti saying here? That O’Rourck is not a fighter because he came from wealth, is a white male, and given this profile has never had to struggle so he is incapable of fighting. The problem with attributing O’Rourck’s weakness to his demographics is that he shares those demographics with the man that Avenetti has identified as a capable fighter. So Avenetti’s argument makes no sense, and in fact he has exposed the flaw in the Democrats endlessly repeated talking point while trying to brown-nose his way back into relevancy.
Simply put, Beto cannot beat Donald Trump.
No one can
If having sex with a Muslim is a criteria for the voting age then the voting age could be as low as nine (9), and I fear, must lower....
Only if he's running against a Republican.
Various sites on the internets connect dots across the O'Rourke family that are not favorable to a Presidential run. Many of the sites are of dubious pedigree, but even a review of Snopes contains the major threads that the dots are connected through. There are even newspaper clippings that prove that the basic factual incidents occurred, if not the imputed motives or dot connections.
The allegations are that:
Add to this his several DUI's, fleeing the scene of an accident, odd childhood poetry writings, and belonging to a teen computer hacking club, and it all paints a picture of someone who was crying out for help for his entire life.
However sympathetic one might be to someone coming from such an unhealthy upbringing, Robert O'Rourke should be kept far, far away from the Presidency of the United States.
-PJ
Instead of Beto, maybe he should be called Beta.
Just imagine having these 2 voting:
I know some of what yours and others here, what their “white privilege” has meant.
It sickens me that they include folks like you and others who have seen hard times in this nonsense.
Not that you would ever complain.
That’s my job lol.
I have never been the stoic type :)
My money is still on Harris, with Beto as veep to try to flip Texas.
Or maybe he just found a decent ghostwriter.
That’s a good example. And we know they’d be coached on who to vote for.
I didn’t want to see him crisp up so I quit watching after the other guy poured the gas on his legs.
If you are old enough for an abortion without your parents consent, or old enough to marry and have sex with a Muslim, then you should be able to vote.
....................................
Is it your age or have you always been this ignorant? Brides in the Muslim world can be as young as 3 years old! In any event, you will no doubt be happy to hear that some Democrat moron in the D.C. swamp wants to introduce a bill that would permit children 10 years old to vote!
Just call him “Beta”, because he’s no Alpha.
He repeats himself?
(Like I’m one to talk. Odds are high I will double post this.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.