Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant

Consider - the Mule did not indict JA. He was taken down by Demmers and those folks. The indictment is for Manning. If BH then the Mule would have indicted JA for DNC based on the Crowdstrike report. I still think leveraged ... but I can’t see BH because the Mule would have retained jurisdiction. It’s inexplicable for me to consider how he could have been kept from doing so if true + full BH.

I think what’s said in the “Q” post is that the MSM saying that “Q” said that Mule was WH is the disinformation. Rather the “Q” posts suggest that Mule + RR are “dirty” and at best leveraged. There has been nothing in “Q” stating that Mule (and [RR] by association) are WH - that is an interesting tact by the #FakeNews to consider now.

It suggests that #FakeNews thinks that it’s helpful to them to associate thought that Mule = WH with “Q” ... how is that helpful to them? If/as anything it leaves me thinking more WH than leveraged!

I will flip & flop to the end. and the day after ;)

For the record - in spite of today’s post, at this moment I’m 97.45% confident that [RR] & the Mule are not all they appear and definitely not blackest of the black.

Things will become much clearer when we see Mule report next week!


116 posted on 04/11/2019 4:42:38 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: Steven W.

Good points. Also, if RR is dirty (and of course if one is dirty, the other is, Q did say that), why is he still in the DoJ? And has been for a long time? There was no timidity in axing a whole bunch of, to use Trump’s phrase, “dirty cops”.


122 posted on 04/11/2019 5:23:29 PM PDT by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.

The only thing I will say for RR is that he may have bought some foregiveness for convincing scumbag Jeff Flake to vote for Kavanaugh (Q said so), and came in handy by signing off on Barr’s summary letter. He knew the jig was up when we retained the Senate, and when Whitaker came in. But he started as a full on black hat. Someone explained to him what would happen unless he got with the program, and he did. He may get immunity.


123 posted on 04/11/2019 5:27:31 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.
POTUS just retweeted this:

Rod Rosenstein Defends Attorney General’s Handling Of Mueller Report https://t.co/qMmzaPYrK4— The Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) April 11, 2019


128 posted on 04/11/2019 5:47:04 PM PDT by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.; Defiant

The good news is all of our back and forth over black or white hats puts the lie to the MSM trope that “Q said Mueller was a white hat”.

No?


129 posted on 04/11/2019 5:50:31 PM PDT by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson