Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo

Thanks.

I’ve never heard an explanation as to why Custer wasn’t issued repeating rifles. But I haven’t researched it, either. I can imagine some Quartermaster took the heat. But Custer should have seen to it.

There are conspiracy theories such as Grant and other top brass set Custer up for failure.


14 posted on 06/25/2019 8:03:31 AM PDT by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: laplata
I’ve never heard an explanation as to why Custer wasn’t issued repeating rifles. But I haven’t researched it, either. I can imagine some Quartermaster took the heat. But Custer should have seen to it.

It's a very simple explanation. Custer wasn't issued repeating rifles because the U.S. Government never bought any repeating rifles.

It was the Army's opinion that the lever action rifles of the time, that used the .44 Henry rimfire cartridge, were inferior to the Trapdoor Springfield firing the .45-70 rifle cartridge.

21 posted on 06/25/2019 8:21:32 AM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: laplata

“I’ve never heard an explanation as to why Custer wasn’t issued repeating rifles.”

I’ve heard that some people in the Army command were resisting switching to more modern rifles, because they thought that soldiers would just waste ammunition firing willy nilly, instead of carefully aiming their shots. I believe it wasn’t until the Spanish-American War that that line of thinking was completely uprooted.


36 posted on 06/25/2019 8:59:37 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson