Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Don Corleone

From what I have read about Custer even from the Civil War until the Little Big Horn he displayed very little tactical subtlety. I’ve read his men hated him and that his unit had the highest desertion rate in the Army. There was an Army leader of that period (Name escapes now!) who by far was the premier Indian fighter of the era. Primarily because he was capable of learning from his mistakes. Developed effective counter-guerilla tactics from encounters with Indian guerilla tactics. This guy brought the Quanah Parker and the Comanches to heel. Custer at least to me always seem to be applying the same tactics over & over again from Civil War to Little Big Horn. Eventually getting disastrous results.


25 posted on 06/25/2019 8:32:16 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Reily

Read up on what he did at Trevilian Station. He almost got wiped out to a man in that battle in 1864.

Same battle plan he put in at LBH. Split the forces up and attack, hoping the shock & awe win the day. Numbers & reconnaissance be damned. He didn’t have reinforcements to save him that last time.


73 posted on 06/25/2019 10:25:40 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal (Like Enoch, Noah, & Lot, the True Church will soon be removed & then destruction comes forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Reily

That would be Ranald Mackenzie, who defeated the Comanches and is forgotten today, even though there was a TV show about him in the early 1960s, Mackenzie’s Raiders. He didn’t get killed by the Indians.


96 posted on 06/25/2019 11:39:02 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson