Skip to comments.
Q Anon: 07/06/19 Trust Trump's Plan
qmap.pub ^
| 07/06/19
| FReepers, vanity
Posted on 07/06/2019 2:17:28 PM PDT by mairdie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,741-1,760, 1,761-1,780, 1,781-1,800 ... 2,221-2,238 next last
To: mairdie
To: KitJ
1,762
posted on
07/09/2019 5:10:18 PM PDT
by
Batman11
( The USA is not an ATM!)
To: TangoLimaSierra
> “I need three vowels that add up to 24”.
OMG I literally just fell off my chair laughing. EXACTLY!
-SB
To: baysider
To: TruthWillWin
Bagster, you took a nap here.
1,765
posted on
07/09/2019 5:24:00 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: BiggBob
HAHAHA!
“Not so funny now….”
1,766
posted on
07/09/2019 5:26:30 PM PDT
by
bitt
(US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
To: TruthWillWin; All
CrowdStrikeOut: Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims ... The report uses qualified and vague language to describe key events, indicating that Mueller and his investigators do not actually know for certain whether Russian intelligence officers stole Democratic Party emails, or how those emails were transferred to WikiLeaks.
The report's timeline of events appears to defy logic. According to its narrative, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange announced the publication of Democratic Party emails not only before he received the documents but before he even communicated with the source that provided them.
There is strong reason to doubt Mueller’s suggestion that an alleged Russian cutout called Guccifer 2.0 supplied the stolen emails to Assange.
Mueller’s decision not to interview Assange – a central figure who claims Russia was not behind the hack – suggests an unwillingness to explore avenues of evidence on fundamental questions....
1,767
posted on
07/09/2019 5:27:30 PM PDT
by
StormFlag
(Even in the mud and scum of things, something always, always sings. Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: Typelouder
1,768
posted on
07/09/2019 5:28:16 PM PDT
by
bitt
(US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
To: bitt
p.s. Is that Bill Maher in the hoodie with the Q computer?
1,769
posted on
07/09/2019 5:31:06 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: bitt
It makes sense it was a black hat picture taker to me, as well. Someone who was in-on-it, or who could profit by blackmail, or to enforce a sense of security from a turncoat among the subjects.
Someone found a way out of the picture, I think?
1,770
posted on
07/09/2019 5:31:10 PM PDT
by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey! Publik Skools/Academia are the Marxists Farm Team for more coming. Infinitum.)
To: bitt
Maher is getting torched on his Twitter site
1,771
posted on
07/09/2019 5:31:40 PM PDT
by
VRWCarea51
(The Original 1998 Version)
To: bitt
Mason’s temple? I’d say Moloch fits better.
1,772
posted on
07/09/2019 5:31:52 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: bagster
To: baysider
1,774
posted on
07/09/2019 5:36:44 PM PDT
by
bitt
(US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
To: bagster
1,775
posted on
07/09/2019 5:38:54 PM PDT
by
bitt
(US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
To: aMorePerfectUnion
After reading about Epstein’s connections, I’m guessing he was tied in with intelligence gathering for blackmail purposes.
As such, he was protected and many were controlled and blackmailed.
CIA? Mossad? Both??
To: bitt
1,777
posted on
07/09/2019 5:40:52 PM PDT
by
bitt
(US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
Seems like Pelosi expects the press to...*gasp*...start asking her real questions soon, so she is shutting them down now:
Pelosi questions Barr's credibility, says she'll no longer address anything he says
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Tuesday declined to answer a reporter’s question about an assertion by Attorney General William P. Barr, saying he had lied to Congress and that she would no longer address “anything more that he has to say.”
Her comments came a day after Barr suggested House Democrats were trying “to create some kind of public spectacle” by requiring former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to testify next week about possible obstruction of justice by President Trump.
“I don’t even want to address him,” Pelosi said when asked about Barr’s assertion. “He has lied to Congress as the attorney general of the United States. He’s lied under oath. I’m not speaking to anything more that he has to say.”
Pelosi’s accusations against Barr are rooted in his appearance at House Appropriations subcommittee hearing in April. Rep. Charlie Crist (D-Fla.) asked Barr about media reports that members of Mueller’s team were frustrated by a summary Barr had produced of their findings from the investigation into interference by Russia in the 2016 election.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pelosi-questions-barrs-credibility-says-shell-no-longer-address-anything-he-says/ar-AAE5uTm?li=BBnb7Kz |
To: bitt
>img src='http://www.invexnews.com/item-379563-why-do-satanists-wear-red-shoes'>
why do satanists wear red shoes??
1,779
posted on
07/09/2019 5:42:22 PM PDT
by
bitt
(US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
To: bitt
1,780
posted on
07/09/2019 5:42:44 PM PDT
by
bitt
(US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,741-1,760, 1,761-1,780, 1,781-1,800 ... 2,221-2,238 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
