Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote; Steven W.; greeneyes; TEXOKIE; txhurl; saywhatagain; Swordmaker; ptsal; bagster; ...

Q 3569 told us Comey would not be prosecuted for leaking.

H/T EtS


192 posted on 08/29/2019 5:16:28 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: generally
I'm just the messenger....

Understand something: Comey wrote these memos & did all this stuff outlined in this report today to try to do...what?

HIDE WHAT HE'D BEEN DOING in SpyGate.

That is correct. https://t.co/qiOoDYhkGJ— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) August 29, 2019

Comey unlawfully leaked “to create public pressure for official action.”

In other words:

An FBI Director leaked info to force the appointment of a Special Counsel that would damage or destroy a duly elected president, all to suit his personal political agenda.

Comey led a coup https://t.co/5DX5FTiukt— Bryan Dean Wright (@BryanDeanWright) August 29, 2019

Comey's "Memo" gambit was to engineer the appointment of a Special Counsel.

WHY did Comey want a Special Counsel appointed?

To take Trump down QUICKLY.

WHY did Comey need Trump taken down quickly?

Because he knew the IG **could follow the FISA paper trail**.— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) August 29, 2019

Comey's memo gambit **appeared to actually work**.

He got the Special Counsel appointed - his old buddy Robert Mueller!

What happened then?

The entire plan went t**s up.— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) August 29, 2019

pic.twitter.com/y7n5KlIdcr— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) August 29, 2019


194 posted on 08/29/2019 5:24:39 PM PDT by little jeremiah (New tagline in the pipeline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Q 3569 told us Comey would not be prosecuted for leaking.

H/T EtS

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I was feeling like it was, "De ja vu all over again" when the news broke today. I could have sworn we already went through this. The exact some news, all over again At the link in the drop you cited, it's the article I recall we were responding to. First comes the "sources" who say he won't be prosecuted. Much disappointment in the land. Troll rush. Then comes the formal announcement and...well...rinse and repeat.

 
3569
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI1 Aug 2019 - 10:19:20 AM
 
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-will-not-prosecute-comey-for-leaking-memos-after-ig-referral-source📁
Bigger [slam-dunk] charges coming?
Public understanding of events just around the corner.
Q

216 posted on 08/29/2019 6:03:21 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

To: generally; ransomnote; Steven W.; greeneyes; TEXOKIE; txhurl; saywhatagain; Swordmaker; ptsal; ...

248 posted on 08/29/2019 7:09:56 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Q 3569 told us Comey would not be prosecuted for leaking.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
1 Aug 2019 - 1:19:20 PM
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-will-not-prosecute-comey-for-leaking-memos-after-ig-referral-source
Bigger [slam-dunk] charges coming?
Public understanding of events just around the corner.
Q


265 posted on 08/29/2019 7:41:10 PM PDT by bitt (The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see.- Ayn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson