Next up will be the IG’s findings regarding Comey’s truthfulness before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court and whether he attested to false or misleading statements in order to electronically monitor a presidential campaign.
That determination may not be as cut-and-dried as many think it is, but it hopefully, at a minimum, will explain why Comey believed he could sign off multiple times on a FISA application based largely on information that he, himself, described as “salacious and unverified.” His exposure here is potentially much more devastating than breaking FBI record retention and handling rules.
Close behind the IG’s second report will be findings by U.S. Attorney John Durham whether Comey and his rogue team of investigators violated FBI and departmental guidelines to initiate a counterintelligence investigation into a presidential campaign. They will determine if Comey had adequate justification for launching such an unprecedented investigation.
But beyond that, Mr. Durham and his team likely will follow up on emerging indicators thatComey may have colluded with other intelligence community leaders to actually “manufacture” the justification needed for an investigation by targeting covert informants against campaign representatives in violation of established policies and procedures.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3775647/posts?page=1
Devin Nunes: DOJ watchdog report on James Comey contains ‘evidence’ for conspiracy complaint
washington examiner ^ | 8/29/2019 | daniel Chaitin
(here’s that interview where Nunes says “building blocks to a charge of CONSPIRACY)
Which brings me full circle to:
Comey
Obviously
Violated
FBI
Ethics
Fabricating
Evidence