Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

If I’m reading that excerpt right, it sounds like the judge isn’t going to order USG to provide clearances until and unless he gets to see the expected Brady Material?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule

If Brady Material shows exculpatory evidence, then I’d think the judge would consider tossing the case, obviating the need to give clearances to Sidney Powell.


733 posted on 09/05/2019 1:13:08 PM PDT by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 727 | View Replies ]


To: KitJ
The order doesn't give any insight into what the judge is going to do, other than take issues out of the order presented - which makes sense to take them out of order.

No sense in ruling on the security issues, then picking up production obligations and dismissing the case.

The order of taking up is just the more efficient order of dealing with issues, based on the range of remedies the court has available.

Sidney Powell's Motion to Compel Production lays out that the judge could reasonably boot the government's lawyers from the case, after which point the security issue could be resolved too. If the government lawyers are booted, the case gets another long delay.

Many different outcomes possible - judge could deny motion to compel too, and swiftly move to deny security.

736 posted on 09/05/2019 1:19:08 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson