“What criminal trespass is when you’re in a location or you stay at a location without effective consent from the owner. So, when you have a guest stay over and you allow someone to stay in your home. If you decide that you don’t want them there any longer, you have to go through the eviction process.”
That's a lot of nonsense. If necessary, federal courts should clarify this for the entire USA.
In the consent given by the owner is the clear implication that consent can be withdrawn at any time.
If the law is not clear about this, it should be made clear.
In states overwhelmed by the decadence of Western Civilization, where a majority of the people do not believe in the ownership of private property or the sanctity of the home, the citizens and the courts, overly concerned by the rights of renters--or squatters--can enact laws to suit themselves.
However, the sane will live under laws that protect the right of a property owner to evict anyone at any time--especially a squatter.
This is where “housing is a human right” thinking has led. There is no private property, if the government decides there is a higher and better use for it.