Q Anon: 09/25/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.178, Q Day 698

qmap.pub ^ | 9/25/19 | FReepers, vanity

[MileHi]

Remember W's FEMA director, the dithering bureaucrat whose nickname was "Brownie"...

Michael Brown. I think that is an unfair characterization of him. He currently hosts a radio program in Denver and he is hard right and definitely white hat. He has nothing good to say about Bush.

[stylin19a]

I just sent and email to devine asking about those 2 reports.

medevine@crs.loc.gov

Now I’m done for now...

[little jeremiah]

Thanks for taking a look and your comments.

I guess Tom Fitton needs to put on his cape and do his thing.

[peteypupperdoo]

“Isn’t he the one that used to work at BreitBart?”

no, but..... if you read his wikipedia page, it’s not all up to par with how most of us here think, so, maybe we should put him, again, in the “sort of trust” category? like gray hat? he worked at the washington times as editor in chief. this from wikipedia...

” Under Solomon, the Times changed some of its style guide to conform to more mainstream media usage. The Times announced that it would no longer use words like “illegal aliens” and “homosexual,” and instead opt for “more neutral terminology” such as “illegal immigrants” and “gay,” respectively. The paper also decided to stop using “Hillary” when referring to Senator Hillary Clinton, and to stop putting the word “marriage” in the expression “gay marriage” in quotes.”

did he see the light? did he come on strong after the forbidden city was shut down?

i’m not sure if you are thinking about ben shapiro? he’s kind of a whiner lol. he left breitbart after defending michelle fields over corey lewandowski was accused of manhandling her. i so wish he had reserved judgement regarding that.

petey

[Steven W.]

New thread: https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3782130/posts

[greeneyes]

Excellent maybe you’ll get a response.

[greeneyes]

You are welcome.

[greeneyes]

“Isn’t he the one that used to work at BreitBart?”
no, but..... if you read his wikipedia page, it’s not all up to par with how most of us here think, so, maybe we should put him, again, in the “sort of trust” category? like gray hat? he worked at the washington times as editor in chief. this from wikipedia...
” Under Solomon, the Times changed some of its style guide to conform to more mainstream media usage. The Times announced that it would no longer use words like “illegal aliens” and “homosexual,” and instead opt for “more neutral terminology” such as “illegal immigrants” and “gay,” respectively. The paper also decided to stop using “Hillary” when referring to Senator Hillary Clinton, and to stop putting the word “marriage” in the expression “gay marriage” in quotes.”
did he see the light? did he come on strong after the forbidden city was shut down?
i’m not sure if you are thinking about ben shapiro? he’s kind of a whiner lol. he left breitbart after defending michelle fields over corey lewandowski was accused of manhandling her. i so wish he had reserved judgement regarding that.
petey
*******************************************************************************
No - not Solomon or Shapiro—Stranaham or something. I’ll have to sleep on it—maybe I’ll remember who it was in a few days. LOL

[greeneyes]

The old form was uploaded to scribe by k paoulsen -> daily beast reporter.
https://twitter.com/kpoulsen/status/1177734528833445888
I have no idea from where he got it.
If it’s accurate,(from the Larry O’Donnell school of reporting) then....What ? I don’t know. Are the changes innocent ? on the surface it seems that way.
Beebe makes a strong case for shennanigans.
******************************************************I vote for dirty tricks/shenanigans!

My question would be...Who commissioned or asked for these research documents and why ? I suppose I could ask him directly(I will) but I’m guessing it’s going to take an FOIA request.

just shoot me.
*****************************************LOL. Nah-no shooting— we need inquiring minds.

[peteypupperdoo]

oops sorry! i should have read the post to which you were replying.

petey

[peteypupperdoo]

“No - not Solomon or Shapiro—Stranaham or something. I’ll have to sleep on it—maybe I’ll remember who it was in a few days. LOL”

you are correct, greeneyes. it was stranahan. i’m not quite sure what andrew breitbart saw in him, but he converted stranahan to conservatism brought him on to breitbart. stranahan has quite a colorful history.

petey

[stylin19a]

Yesterday, the ICIG clarified that the old form is wrong regarding the law.

Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community’s Statement on Processing of Whistleblower Complaints

they cite: 50 U.S.C. § 3033(k)(5)(A)
3033(k)(5)(B)
3033(k)(5)(G)(i)


If the IG's law citations are correct, the part of the form with ""Background Information on ICWPA Process"(instructions & explanations),that has the first hand knowledge explanation, is wrong.
Which can beg the question, why even have that checkoff in the first place.

I'll go check the citations but I'm guessing this avenue is dead.

Just a note: Even though it is claimed the WB checked off the first hand knowledge box,
There is nothing in the unclassified whistle blower complaint where he\she claims first hand knowledge.

[greeneyes]

Yesterday, the ICIG clarified that the old form is wrong regarding the law.
*****************************************************************************
Color me skeptical. LOL