Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tired&retired
Once again the timeline is too short. You are absolutely correct, but the timeline is much longer for these different cycles to come together for the absolute perfect storm that causes ice ages. Here is the problem, We set our sights and timelines far too short. Now... I am going to share something once again that not ONE person here has actually taken a very close in depth look at... Think about this... We only have about 350 thousand years of ice core samples to test at this point in time. But Man has been around for over 2 million years. Scope of concept... The species of man has survived a minimum of 24 very normal "on time" Glacial/Inter-Glacial cycles about 124.000 years apart. But our own ignorance and religion will not let us even accept or see more than "tomorrow" or "next week" as a timeline in all this. What the hell happened to the larger perspective that the ancient Greeks debated in BC? We have gone dumb and ignorant as a species... Just dumb as hell... This is huge... Look at it close... We started cooler about 8k ago because this is when Solar Isolation started to decrease and CO2 started to increase naturally somehow... So where are we at this point? They are all complete idiots or they are paid off under the table. But to prepare for warming is a huge mistake because the cold is indeed coming... It has and always will be a normal cycle every 124,000 years.
69 posted on 12/13/2019 3:12:11 PM PST by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Openurmind

You are correct. There are many cycles within cycles. Even the Big Bang is part of a continuous repeating cycle.

Direction of flow us the key.


73 posted on 12/13/2019 3:35:28 PM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Openurmind
I am going to share something once again that not ONE person here has actually taken a very close in depth look at.

You'd be wrong about that (although I agree with you overall). I've been posting for some years, here, for discussion, those graphs going back many hundreds of thousands of years, or even millions of years. Here's a link to one:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/Five_Myr_Climate_Change.svg/1280px-Five_Myr_Climate_Change.svg.png

(By Dragons flight (Robert A. Rohde), svg by Jo - svg-version of Five_Myr_Climate_Change.png; original image by User:Dragons flight, based on data (figure 4?) from Lisiecki and Raymo (2005), CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5891468)

Note the change in cycle periods starting about 1 million years ago, and note the increasingly wild oscillations in general.

85 posted on 12/13/2019 4:20:59 PM PST by Paul R. (The Lib / Socialist goal: Total control of nothing left worth controlling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Openurmind
(By Dragons flight (Robert A. Rohde), svg by Jo - svg-version of Five_Myr_Climate_Change.png; original image by User:Dragons flight, based on data (figure 4?) from Lisiecki and Raymo (2005), CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5891468)
87 posted on 12/13/2019 4:23:23 PM PST by Paul R. (The Lib / Socialist goal: Total control of nothing left worth controlling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson