http://classichollywoodactresses.blogspot.com/2017/12/did-kirk-douglas-rape-natalie-wood.html
Oh, Lets not kid ourselves!!! I have said repeatedly that my goal has never been to change your point of view. I am sure you spotted the link I just included previously. But there is no link, no news source, no blog, no testimony, nothing, not even if you were shown video of the actual event by an eye witness that could ever shake your faith or image of Kirk Douglass. There would always be some reason why it wasn’t credible to you. This is the definition of hero worship. I recognized it from your first posts. Why you Issur Danielovitch Demsky, aka Kirk Douglass is one of your chosen heros you hasn’t really been explained. But if you prefer to worship good looking people who make their living pretending to be heros that is your choice. I am sure there are a lot of other professional keyboard jockeys who do the same thing.
1. I have no “heros”. I can admire a person’s work without having to admire is politics or his personal life.
I separate the two.
I don’t know how you would gather from my post that Kirk Douglas is an idol of mine. That is an unwarranted extrapolation on your part.
Based on our exchanges so far, I can see that you fancy yourself as a mib reader (a very poor one at that )?
2. The blog you referred to tells us that Natalie Wood spent years in therapy. Who is the therapist? Can we gather his notes now that both Kirk and Natalie are dead?
Even more important, if her family wants to get the truth out there, all it would take is to allow the release of the therapist’s notes.
Absent that, absent Natalie not even mentioning any event nor Kirk Douglas’ name, how are we to believe this blog?
Look, there’s a woman today alive who insisted that Trump tried to rape her. We can at least cross examine her openly. Without any word from Natalie Wood herself, no name of this therapist, no notes from him, why should we believe this blogger?